The twin towers were demolished by controlled explosion plan after plan. The Pentagon was hit by a missile, and not by a plane. The hijacked planes were imbottititi of explosive (and their passengers, kidnapped, were killed elsewhere and dumped into the Ocean). The building 7 of the World Trade Center, next to the Twin towers, was demolished intentionally and not collapsed as a result of the fire. Israel has conceived and organised the attack, to provoke a global conflict between United States and the Arab world (and the Mossad warned Jews who worked in the twin towers to stay home on the morning of September 11).Any event, since the assassination in Dallas of JFK, has given rise to so many ideas and theories complottiste. According to many of these are widely present in the network, the 11 September would be the result of a conspiracy of the US Government to impose an authoritarian regime and restore oxygen, through military expenditure and control of energy sources, declining to capitalism. The first doubts about the official version of the attack are on the other hand, and date back to the moments immediately following the collapse of the skyscrapers. As narrated by Robyn Swan and Anthony Summers, authors of The Eleventh Day: The Full Story of 9/11 and Osama bin Laden, already in the afternoon of 11 September, a boy named David Rostcheck left the Chair in front of the TV, where he had witnessed the disaster, set to the computer. In a chatroom wrote: "it seems that there has been a fire but a controlled demolition. If you do not tell us something more in the next few days, then there is indeed something strange ".
By that afternoon the theories complottiste have proliferated. If some environments friendly to have very little credibility (the Zionist conspiracy theory was for example raised by authors who deny the Holocaust, and has no basis: a dead on ten of the 11 September was Jewish), and in many other cases the conspiracy idea grew in academic circles, among ex-officials of the Cia and Fbi and between the same US army ranks. One of the most known propagators of doubts about the official version is for example a theology Professor, David Griffin, who has written nine books to prove that the attacks "were conceived within the State apparatus" to justify in front of the international public opinion the war in the Middle East.
Through the years such theories have extended well beyond the restricted circles of the Academy and experts and passionate intelligence. A 2006 survey indicated that an American on three believed the Bush Administration had somehow lied (or directly planning attacks, or doing nothing to avoid them, in order to invade Iraq). The phenomenon has taken on dimensions such as to lead the US Government to publish in 2009 a document on its website to clarify major doubts. Without much success. The truthers, supporters of the conspiracy, they continue to spread their thesis and to sow doubts (also thanks to the extraordinary flying offered by the network). Here are four of the most accredited complottiste thesis (and the reasons that make them little credible).
Vice President Dick Cheney ordered the American military aviation does not stand up in flight and not to intercept the hijacked planes. This would explain the delay in the response capacity of the Bush administration. The official version instead rotates on a lack of coordination between organs of civil air traffic control (Faa) and military aviation. The multiple-character attacks, an anti-aircraft system conceived at the time of the cold war and addressed outside of the country, deactivating identification instruments on board, would the other elements capable of explaining the slowness in the reaction.One of the most widespread theories complottiste (incurred for example in the books by Steven Jones, a physicist of Brigham Young University) about the possibility that the two towers were torn down through a series of explosive charges (that would seem to be accredited by the images of explosions in the upper floors of buildings). In fact, each controlled demolition of a building occurs by shine the lower floors. More. A search of the National Institute of Standards and Technology concluded that the impact of aircraft against the two towers permanently damaged pillars. 10 thousand gallons of gasoline, spread over several floors, burst fire. Under the influence of high temperatures, the floors began to swell, while even the perimeter columns sagged and put in place a series of dynamic processes which led to the final collapse.In 9/11. The Big Lie, the French Thierry Meyssan has argued that the Pentagon was destroyed by a missile, and that the remains of a plane were brought on site to simulate the disaster. In fact, dozens of bodies of passengers and crew members were found in the area of impact. The aircraft was seen circling over the Pentagon, and was photographed by many. No evidence indicating the distribution of the remains of a plane on the site of the disaster was never found.Some truthers argue that the hijacked planes were stuffed with explosives, and who were explode with a remote-controlled mechanism. The alleged passengers on board were killed elsewhere and their bodies then dumped in the ocean. Here too there is evidence that demonstrate unequivocally the presence of passengers aboard the hijacked planes. Phone games by aircraft, and directed to family and friends of passengers were made with the phones on the back of chairs.Earlier this September 11 articoloUsa, ten years after
How has changed the economiaUn children's book about September 11
And ' controversy on "Muslim extremists" use, the security industry
flourished in the shadow of the twin towers
No comments:
Post a Comment